Understanding the New BIS 50% Rule: What Manufacturers Need to Know
The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has implemented an important change that affects many manufacturers involved in international trade. Effective immediately as of September 29, 2025, businesses must now adhere to the 50% ownership rule, which significantly broadens the scope of entities subject to U.S. export restrictions.
The BIS 50% rule states that any entity that is owned 50% or more by parties listed on the BIS Entity List or the Military End-User (MEU) List will now be treated as if it were listed itself. This includes direct and indirect ownership, meaning that companies may face unexpected restrictions if they are affiliated with any entity on these lists.
The Transfer of Liability: Then Versus Now
Previously, subsidiaries and affiliates enjoyed a layer of protection even if their parent or sibling companies were listed on the Entity List. However, with the implementation of the new rule, the picture has changed dramatically. Now, thousands of subsidiaries are susceptible to violations that previously would not have endangered them. Companies need to begin evaluating their ownership chains to protect themselves against unforeseen consequences.
What Triggers Additional Due Diligence?
If a foreign entity is owned less than 50%, that situation is now considered a "Red Flag." Exporters are required to conduct additional due diligence to ascertain whether their partners risk being linked to restricted entities. If an ownership structure is not clear, extra caution must be exercised before proceeding with transactions.
Implications for Compliance
This expansion of the BIS regulations means that compliance strategies must also evolve. Manufacturers and exporters will likely need to invest in new screening tools to identify potential risks. As new risks emerge with the broadened ownership definitions, firms must implement robust compliance frameworks to ensure adherence to the new regulations.
Navigating the Challenges Ahead
The complexities of this new rule could overwhelm companies lacking the resources to conduct extensive ownership analysis. Producers should consider utilizing external compliance resources that provide detailed ownership analysis as a part of their OFAC compliance program.
Moreover, engaging with experts can help manufacturers navigate their obligations, ensuring that they meet compliance without compromising operational efficiency.
Potential Impact on International Trade
The BIS's changes to the ownership rule will have substantial implications. For manufacturers exporting goods, the ownership regulations intersect both national security and trade law, thereby complicating interactions with foreign entities. Firms must remain vigilant and engage in exhaustive screening processes to safeguard against regulatory infractions.
Conclusion: Take Action Now
Due to the incorporation of the 50% rule into BIS regulations, the need for precise knowledge regarding the ownership structure of engaged parties is paramount. Manufacturers must build a culture of compliance to address ownership issues proactively. If there is any uncertainty, applying for a license or engaging experts may be the necessary steps to navigate these changes effectively.
For those concerned about how these changes affect their operations, reaching out to compliance professionals for tailored support could mean the difference between smooth sailing and a potentially costly regulatory oversight.
Add Row
Add
Write A Comment